Is it me? Or is Hollywood having a laugh at our expense?
Two critically acclaimed films, Tristram Shandy and Syriana, have caused much consternation at ICBYCWIT HQ in recent days.
A roomful of university-educated people simply failed to get the gist of these two very popular movies, and in one case even drove us to sleep.
If you thought Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (“perhaps too clever for its own good“ wrote one reviewer) had a complicated plot, don’t see either of these intellectual aerobics videos.
In the story of Tristam Shandy, Steve Coogan plays Steve Coogan, an insecure actor playing the title role as well as his father. Rob Brydon plays Rob Brydon, another insecure actor trying to gain more time prominence in the film. He does this (I think) with the help of Gillian Anderson playing Gillian Anderson, a successful but out-of-work Hollywood actress who is a big fan of the book the film is based on.
The film is an autobiography of the title character, which abrubtly ends shortly after he is born, and the cameras go behind the scenes instead. And that’s the point where it lost me. Is it a film about this guy Tristram Shandy, or is it a DVD extra?
David Denby wrote in the New Yorker:
“One trouble with the current vogue for meta-cinema is that its practioners, such as Winterbottom and Charlie Kaufman, underestimate the extraordinary difficulty of telling a good story straight.”
It’s got a great website though.
Which brings me to Syriana, the most complicated movie I’ve ever seen.
George Clooney plays Bob, a sinister type of guy with a beard who speaks Farsi and blows things up, and Matt Damon reprises part of his Bourne Identity role as Bryan, an energy market analyst living peacefully with his family in Geneva.
Bob probably works for the CIA and they want him to do something different, like a desk job, but he’s never done that before. So they find something special for him to do.
One of Bryan’s young children is killed tragically, but he scores a lucrative consulting contract as a result. He wonders how much his other child is worth.
Um, then some stuff blows up, I doze off and two hours later, the credits are rolling.
Oh yeah, I get it now, it’s the complex interplay between the Arab prince and the corporate lawyer trying to… no, I missed it too.
And it appears I’m not the only one. In her San Francisco Chronicle review entitled The international battle for oil has rarely seemed so confusing, Ruthe Stein writes:
“It’s hard to get passionately swept away by a movie when you’re struggling continually to figure out who’s doing what to whom and why.”
Tell me about it. At least Tristram was trying to be funny.